4.6 Article

MIMO Radar Parallel Simulation System Based on CPU/GPU Architecture

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22010396

Keywords

graphics processing unit (GPU); central processing unit (CPU); parallel processing; multiple-input multiple-output radar

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper focuses on the time division signal processing flow for MIMO radar and proposes an improved algorithm to enhance its processing speed. A parallel simulation system based on CPU/GPU architecture is introduced, which performs significantly faster than serial computing equipment and achieves satisfactory acceleration effects.
The data volume and computation task of MIMO radar is huge; a very high-speed computation is necessary for its real-time processing. In this paper, we mainly study the time division MIMO radar signal processing flow, propose an improved MIMO radar signal processing algorithm, raising the MIMO radar algorithm processing speed combined with the previous algorithms, and, on this basis, a parallel simulation system for the MIMO radar based on the CPU/GPU architecture is proposed. The outer layer of the framework is coarse-grained with OpenMP for acceleration on the CPU, and the inner layer of fine-grained data processing is accelerated on the GPU. Its performance is significantly faster than the serial computing equipment, and satisfactory acceleration effects have been achieved in the CPU/GPU architecture simulation. The experimental results show that the MIMO radar parallel simulation system with CPU/GPU architecture greatly improves the computing power of the CPU-based method. Compared with the serial sequential CPU method, GPU simulation achieves a speedup of 130 times. In addition, the MIMO radar signal processing parallel simulation system based on the CPU/GPU architecture has a performance improvement of 13%, compared to the GPU-only method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available