4.6 Article

Fusion-Learning of Bayesian Network Models for Fault Diagnostics

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 21, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21227633

Keywords

fusion-learning; Bayesian Network; smart maintenance; fault diagnostics; natural language processing; technical language processing

Funding

  1. NIST
  2. Penn State University [70NANB14H255]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a fusion-learning method for Bayesian Networks (BNs) to improve fault diagnosis, utilizing both quantitative and qualitative data sources, resulting in better diagnostic outcomes with wider fault coverage compared to individual BN models.
Bayesian Network (BN) models are being successfully applied to improve fault diagnosis, which in turn can improve equipment uptime and customer service. Most of these BN models are essentially trained using quantitative data obtained from sensors. However, sensors may not be able to cover all faults and therefore such BN models would be incomplete. Furthermore, many systems have maintenance logs that can serve as qualitative data, potentially containing historic causation information in unstructured natural language replete with technical terms. The motivation of this paper is to leverage all of the data available to improve BN learning. Specifically, we propose a method for fusion-learning of BNs: for quantitative data obtained from sensors, metrology data and qualitative data from maintenance logs, corrective and preventive action reports, and then follow by fusing these two BNs. Furthermore, we propose a human-in-the-loop approach for expert knowledge elicitation of the BN structure aided by logged natural language data instead of relying exclusively on their anecdotal memory. The resulting fused BN model can be expected to provide improved diagnostics as it has a wider fault coverage than the individual BNs. We demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed method using real world data from uninterruptible power supply (UPS) fault diagnostics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available