4.6 Article

Identifying and Characterizing Conveyor Belt Longitudinal Rip by 3D Point Cloud Processing

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 21, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21196650

Keywords

longitudinal rip; 3D point cloud; clustering process; principal component analysis (PCA)

Funding

  1. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A method of identifying longitudinal rips on a conveyor belt through 3D point cloud processing is proposed in this study, which has been tested to show real-time accuracy and effective characterization of the rips in practical experiments.
Real-time and accurate longitudinal rip detection of a conveyor belt is crucial for the safety and efficiency of an industrial haulage system. However, the existing longitudinal detection methods possess drawbacks, often resulting in false alarms caused by tiny scratches on the belt surface. A method of identifying the longitudinal rip through three-dimensional (3D) point cloud processing is proposed to solve this issue. Specifically, the spatial point data of the belt surface are acquired by a binocular line laser stereo vision camera. Within these data, the suspected points induced by the rips and scratches were extracted. Subsequently, a clustering and discrimination mechanism was employed to distinguish the rips and scratches, and only the rip information was used as alarm criterion. Finally, the direction and maximum width of the rip can be effectively characterized in 3D space using the principal component analysis (PCA) method. This method was tested in practical experiments, and the experimental results indicate that this method can identify the longitudinal rip accurately in real time and simultaneously characterize it. Thus, applying this method can provide a more effective and appropriate solution to the identification scenes of longitudinal rip and other similar defects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available