4.6 Article

Impact of Lung Segmentation on the Diagnosis and Explanation of COVID-19 in Chest X-ray Images

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 21, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21217116

Keywords

COVID-19; chest X-ray; semantic segmentation; explainable artificial intelligence

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrated the impact of lung segmentation in COVID-19 identification using CXR images, achieving good Jaccard distance and Dice coefficient for segmentation. It investigated the generalization of COVID-19 from images created from different sources, finding a strong bias introduced by underlying factors from different sources even after segmentation.
COVID-19 frequently provokes pneumonia, which can be diagnosed using imaging exams. Chest X-ray (CXR) is often useful because it is cheap, fast, widespread, and uses less radiation. Here, we demonstrate the impact of lung segmentation in COVID-19 identification using CXR images and evaluate which contents of the image influenced the most. Semantic segmentation was performed using a U-Net CNN architecture, and the classification using three CNN architectures (VGG, ResNet, and Inception). Explainable Artificial Intelligence techniques were employed to estimate the impact of segmentation. A three-classes database was composed: lung opacity (pneumonia), COVID-19, and normal. We assessed the impact of creating a CXR image database from different sources, and the COVID-19 generalization from one source to another. The segmentation achieved a Jaccard distance of 0.034 and a Dice coefficient of 0.982. The classification using segmented images achieved an F1-Score of 0.88 for the multi-class setup, and 0.83 for COVID-19 identification. In the cross-dataset scenario, we obtained an F1-Score of 0.74 and an area under the ROC curve of 0.9 for COVID-19 identification using segmented images. Experiments support the conclusion that even after segmentation, there is a strong bias introduced by underlying factors from different sources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available