4.6 Article

Compact Sphere-Shaped Airflow Vector Sensor Based on MEMS Differential Pressure Sensors

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22031087

Keywords

airflow vector sensor; differential pressure sensor; drone stability

Funding

  1. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO)
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [JP20H05752]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents an airflow vector sensor designed for drones, which can directly detect airflow and improve flight stability. The sensor is compact, lightweight, and highly sensitive, capable of measuring wind velocity and direction.
This paper presents an airflow vector sensor for drones. Drones are expected to play a role in various industrial fields. However, the further improvement of flight stability is a significant issue. In particular, compact drones are more affected by wind during flight. Thus, it is desirable to detect air current directly by an airflow sensor and feedback to the control. In the case of a drone in flight, the sensor should detect wind velocity and direction, particularly in the horizontal direction, for a sudden crosswind. In addition, the sensor must also be small, light, and highly sensitive. Here, we propose a compact spherical airflow sensor for drones. Three highly sensitive microelectromechanical system (MEMS) differential pressure (DP) sensor chips were built in the spherical housing as the sensor elements. The 2D wind direction and velocity can be measured from these sensor elements. The fabricated airflow sensor was attached to a small toy drone. It was demonstrated that the sensor provided an output corresponding to the wind velocity and direction when horizontal wind was applied via a fan while the drone was flying. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed sensor will be helpful for directly measuring the air current for a drone in flight.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available