4.2 Article

Time series modeling of live-cell shape dynamics for image-based phenotypic profiling

Journal

INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 73-90

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1039/c5ib00283d

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIGMS [GM69668]
  2. NSF PoLS [PHY 1305537]
  3. Ludwig Postdoctoral Fellowship
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM069668] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. Division Of Physics [1305537] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Live-cell imaging can be used to capture spatio-temporal aspects of cellular responses that are not accessible to fixed-cell imaging. As the use of live-cell imaging continues to increase, new computational procedures are needed to characterize and classify the temporal dynamics of individual cells. For this purpose, here we present the general experimental-computational framework SAPHIRE (Stochastic Annotation of Phenotypic Individual-cell Responses) to characterize phenotypic cellular responses from time series imaging datasets. Hidden Markov modeling is used to infer and annotate morphological state and state-switching properties from image-derived cell shape measurements. Time series modeling is performed on each cell individually, making the approach broadly useful for analyzing asynchronous cell populations. Twocolor fluorescent cells simultaneously expressing actin and nuclear reporters enabled us to profile temporal changes in cell shape following pharmacological inhibition of cytoskeleton-regulatory signaling pathways. Results are compared with existing approaches conventionally applied to fixed-cell imaging datasets, and indicate that time series modeling captures heterogeneous dynamic cellular responses that can improve drug classification and offer additional important insight into mechanisms of drug action. The software is available at http://saphire-hcs.org.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available