4.7 Article

Thermal stability of dopants in boron carbide

Journal

SCRIPTA MATERIALIA
Volume 206, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114263

Keywords

Annealing; Doped boron carbide; Boron/silicon; X-ray diffraction; Raman spectroscopy

Funding

  1. Army Research Laboratory [W911NF-12-2-0022]
  2. Defense Advanced Research Project Agency [W31P4Q-13-1-000]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the stability of boron and silicon in boron carbide varies, with boron showing higher stability while silicon is in a metastable state under certain conditions. Dedoping of silicon may result in amorphization and degrade the ballistic performance of boron carbide.
Undoped (B4C), B rich (B5.5C), and B/Si co-doped (Si-B6.5C) boron carbides were annealed at 500 degrees C for up to 21 days to investigate the thermal stability of primary dopants, B and Si. Structural changes associated with dedoping were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman spectroscopy. The stable phase B4C showed no microstructural or lattice parameter changes. Similarly, lattice parameters of B5.5C remained constant, suggesting that B dopant is stable at the given conditions. However, the shortened lattice parameters and reduced Si content of Si-B6.5C over the annealing time indicated that Si dopant was in a metastable state at the annealing temperature. Consequently, Si dedoping led to an increase in amorphization (a loss of local crystalline order) which degrades the ballistic performance of boron carbide. The insight highlights the importance of Si dopant in boron carbide and suggests that rapid processing may be necessary to retain more silicon for better performance. (C) 2021 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available