4.7 Article

Physiological and transcriptional response of carbohydrate and nitrogen metabolism in tomato plant leaves to nickel ion and nitrogen levels

Journal

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
Volume 292, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110620

Keywords

Biosynthesis of amino acids; Glycolytic pathway-tricarboxylic acid cycle; Nitrogen assimilation; RNA-seq

Categories

Funding

  1. Major special subject of science and technology of Fujian Province [2018NZ0002-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that nickel ion can regulate the carbohydrate and nitrogen metabolism of tomato plant leaves, especially under low nitrogen supply. Transcriptome analysis of the leaves revealed that genes associated with nitrogen metabolism were downregulated under low nitrogen conditions, while those regulated by nickel ion showed high transcript abundances.
This study investigated how nickel ion (Ni2+) improves carbohydrate and nitrogen (N) metabolism in tomato plant leaves under different N supply levels. We exposed the tomato plants to two levels of N (7.66 and 0.383 mmol center dot L-1) and two levels of Ni2+ (0 and 0.1 mg center dot L-1 NiSO4) under hydroponic conditions. After nine days of treatments, we harvested the leaves for physiological, biochemical, and transcriptome sequencing analysis. Low N (LN) levels reduced the concentration of total N and the activities of enzymes; however, Ni2+ can regulate these levels. Leaf transcriptome analysis identified 3277 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The DEGs asso-ciated with the glycolytic pathway-tricarboxylic acid (EMP pathway-TCA) cycle, biosynthesis of amino acids, and N metabolism were downregulated after low N application, whereas those regulated by Ni2+ showed high transcript abundances. This study provides valuable insights into the carbohydrate and N metabolism mechanism of tomato plant leaves in response to Ni2+ and N levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available