4.7 Article

Secondary aerosol formation from a Chinese gasoline vehicle: Impacts of fuel (E10, gasoline) and driving conditions (idling, cruising)

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 795, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148809

Keywords

Go:PAM reactor; SOA formation potential; Driving conditions; E10; SOA estimation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51636003, 41977179, 91844301]
  2. Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission [Z201100008220011]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Beijing [8192022]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M680242]
  5. Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Multi-phase Complex Systems [MPCS-2021-D-12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chassis dynamometer experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of vehicle speed and usage of ethanol-blended gasoline on the formation and evolution of vehicular secondary organic aerosol using a Gothenburg Potential Aerosol Mass reactor. The results showed that SOA formed rapidly and the density increased with exposure to hydroxyl radicals. The study also found no significant difference in SOA formation between pure gasoline and E10, suggesting the presence of missing precursors.
Chassis dynamometer experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of vehicle speed and usage of ethanol-blended gasoline (E10) on formation and evolution of gasoline vehicular secondary organic aerosol (SOA) using a Gothenburg Potential Aerosol Mass (Go: PAM) reactor. The SOA forms rapidly, and its concentration exceeds that of primary organic aerosol (POA) at an equivalent photochemical age (EPA) of -1 day. The particle effective densities grow from 0.62 = 0.02 g cm(-3) to 1.43 = 0.07 g cm(-3) with increased hydroxyl radical (OH) exposure. The maximum SOA production under idling conditions (4259-7394 mg kg-fuel(-1)) is -20 times greater than under cruising conditions. There was no statistical difference between SOA formation from pure gasoline and its formation from E10. The slopes in Van Krevelen diagram indicate that the formation pathways of bulk SOA includes the addition of both alcohol/peroxide functional groups and carboxylic add formation from fragmentation. A closure estimation of SOA based on bottom-up and top-down methods shows that only 16%-38% of the measured SOA can be explained by the oxidation of measured volatile organic compounds (VOCs), suggesting the existence of missing precursors, e.g. unmeasured VOCs and probably semivolatile or intermediate volatile organic compounds (S/IVOCs). Our results suggest that applying parameters obtained from unified driving cycles to model SOA concentrations may lead to large discrepancies between modeled and ambient vehicular SOA. No reduction in vehicular SOA production is realized by replacing normal gasoline with E10. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available