4.7 Review

Considering landscape-level processes in ecosystem service assessments

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 796, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149028

Keywords

Ecosystem service supply; Ecosystem service demand; Ecosystem service flows; Landscape composition and configuration; Spatial explicit models; Landscape sustainability

Funding

  1. FAPESP/SPRINT [2017/50015-5]
  2. University of Sao Paulo (USP)
  3. University of Queensland (UQ)
  4. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPQ) [307934/2011-0]
  5. FAPESP [2013/23457-6]
  6. University of Queens-land Research Training Scholarship
  7. University of Queensland AOU Top Up scholarship
  8. National Council of Science and Technology, Mexico
  9. 'Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement-Brazil' (CAPES) [88882.327885/2019-01, 88887.309513/2018-00]
  10. COLCIENCIAS [728]
  11. University of Queensland Research Training program
  12. Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED)
  13. ARC [FT200100096]
  14. [2017/19411-1]
  15. [2018/06330-6]
  16. Australian Research Council [FT200100096] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The provision of ecosystem services is spatially influenced by landscape structure, but landscape-level processes are often not comprehensively considered in assessments, with a focus on supply rather than demand and flows. It is necessary to better incorporate landscape processes in order to achieve more accurate and spatially precise estimates in ecosystem service assessments.
The provision of ecosystem services is inherently spatial. Landscape structure affects service provision through multiple landscape-level processes, such as fragmentation, edge and connectivity effects. These processes can affect areas of ecosystem service supply and demand, and the flows linking those areas. Despite the emergence of sophisticated spatial ecosystem service assessments in the last two decades, we show through a literature review that landscape-level processes are still rarely considered in a comprehensive way. Even when they are considered, landscape effects are mostly limited to landscape composition, and configuration effects are underrepresented. Furthermore, most studies infer ecosystem service provision by only evaluating supply, ignoring demand and flows. Here we present a simple conceptual framework that illustrates how to incorporate landscape-level processes in the assessment of the different components of the service provision chain (supply, demand and flows). Using simulations, we evaluated how estimations of ecosystem service provision change when considering different landscape processes and discussed the implications of disregarding landscape effects. However, to fully implement the framework, a series of challenges linked to mapping and quantifying supply and demand, defining adequate scales of analysis, measuring flows, and parameterizing models for different types of services, still need to be overcome. To promote an adequate use and management of ecosystem services, it is essential to better incorporate landscape processes in ecosystem service assessments. This will lead to more quantitatively accurate and spatially precise estimates. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available