Assessing the carbon footprint across the supply chain: Cow milk vs soy drink

Since livestock product consumption could have a significant effect on tackling climate change, in the few last years, there has been an increasing consumer demand for non-dairy alternatives. Despite plant-based beverages being considered crucial to foster the transition towards sustainable diet models, no studies have yet compared the level of emissions of plant-based beverages with animal-based ones. The present study aims at computing the carbon footprint of cow milk and that of soy drink and evaluating the carbon footprint results in the light of the substitutability of cow's milk with soy drink, analyzing the potential environmental, economic and nutritional trade-offs between the two products. Results highlight that, considering the environmental perspective, soy drink could be a valid substitute of cow milk: its production has a lower carbon footprint, allowing for the achievement of food security objectives. How-ever, focusing on the economic and nutritional perspectives, the high average consumer price of soy drink is as-sociated with an overall lower nutritional level. In order to reach the same nutritional value as 1 L of cow milk in terms of protein intake, the consumption of soy drink should be increased by 13%. Furthermore, soy drink con-sumption implies paying 66% more than for cow milk, when considering the same protein content. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Automated summary

The study shows that from an environmental perspective, soy drink can be an effective substitute for cow milk due to its lower carbon footprint, contributing to achieving food security objectives. However, from economic and nutritional perspectives, the high average consumer price of soy drink is associated with an overall lower nutritional level, requiring a 13% increase in consumption to reach the same protein intake as 1 L of cow milk.