4.7 Article

Sieving soil before incubation experiments overestimates carbon mineralization but underestimates temperature sensitivity

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 806, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150962

Keywords

Soil aggregates; Undisturbed soils; Carbon sequestration; Temperature sensitivity; No-till; Residue returning

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32071977]
  2. Chinese Universities Scientific Fund [2021TC106]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil sieving can lead to a temporary increase in mineralization, affecting estimates of SOC mineralization, especially in soils managed with NT. Although sieved soils may overestimate SOC mineralization and underestimate Q10, sieving soil is still considered a suitable approach to evaluate the relative impacts of NT and RR on SOC mineralization and Q10.
The sensitivity of soil organic carbon (SOC) mineralization to temperature could affect the future atmospheric CO2 levels under global warming. Sieved soils are widely used to assess SOC mineralization and its temperature sensitivity (Q10) via laboratory incubation. However, sieved soils cause a temporary increase in mineralization due to the destruction of soil structure, which can affect estimates of SOC mineralization, especially in soils managed with no-till (NT). To identify the effects of soil sieving on SOC mineralization and Q10, soil was collected from an 11-year field experiment under a wheat-maize cropping system managed with a combination of tillage [NT and plow tillage (PT)] and residue [residue returning (RR) and residue removal (R0)]. Soil was either sieved or left in an undisturbed state and incubated at 15 degrees C and 25 degrees C. SOC mineralization in sieved soils at 25 degrees C was 47.28 g C kg-1 SOC, 160.1% higher than SOC mineralization in undisturbed soils (P < 0.05). Interestingly, Q10 values in sieved soils were 1.29, 77.6% lower than Q10 in undisturbed soils (P < 0.05). Highly significant correlations (P < 0.01) were observed between sieved and undisturbed soils for SOC mineralization (r = 0.85-0.98) and Q10 (r = 0.78-0.87). Soil macro-aggregates had lower SOC mineralization by 6.1-21.9%, but higher Q10 values by 4.7-6.5% compared with micro-aggregates, contributing to lower mineralization and higher Q10 under NT and RR. Furthermore, structure equation and random forest modelling showed that increased SOC contents in NT and RR could not only reduce SOC mineralization, but also constrained the improvement of Q10 in NT and RR. Overall, these results indicated that although sieved soils overestimated SOC mineralization and underestimated Q10 due to the destruction of macro-aggregates, the patterns between treatments were similar and sieving soil for incubation is considered as a suitable approach to evaluate the relative impacts of NT and RR on SOC mineralization and Q10. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available