4.7 Article

Fullerene nanoparticles for the treatment of ulcerative colitis

Journal

SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages 1146-1156

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11427-021-2001-0

Keywords

fullerene; ulcerative colitis; immunity

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51832008, 51772300, 52072374]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease without an effective cure, but a novel therapeutic strategy using C-60 fullerene suspension (C60FS) has shown promising results in an animal model. C60FS can repair colon barrier dysfunction, promote ulcer healing, reduce inflammation, and inhibit the expression of certain receptors and inflammatory markers in colorectal tissues. This study provides a reliable strategy based on fullerene for treating UC and offers a novel approach for UC therapy.
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a long-term, recurrent inflammatory bowel disease for which no effective cure is yet available in the clinical setting. Repairing the barrier dysfunction of the colon and reducing intestinal inflammation are considered key objectives to cure UC. Here we demonstrate a novel therapeutic strategy based on a C-60 fullerene suspension (C60FS) to treat dinitrobenzene sulfonic acid-induced UC in an animal model. C60FS can repair the barrier dysfunction of UC and effectively promote the healing of ulcers; it also manifests better treatment effects compared with mesalazine enema. C60FS can reduce the numbers of basophils in the blood of UC rats and mast cells in the colorectal tissue, thereby effectively alleviating inflammation. The expression of H1R, H4R, and VEGFR2 receptors in colorectal tissues is inhibited by C60FS, and the levels of histamine and prostaglandin in the rat blood are reduced. This work presents a reliable strategy based on fullerene to cure UC and provides a novel guide for UC treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available