4.5 Review

Effectiveness of kinesiotaping in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sms.14084

Keywords

athletic tape; kinesiotaping; meta-analysis; randomized clinical trial; subacromial impingement syndrome

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Kinesiotaping with or without co-interventions was found to be not superior to other interventions in improving shoulder pain intensity, function, and range of motion flexion for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome.
Objective To determine the effectiveness of kinesiotaping (KT) with or without co-interventions for clinical outcomes in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). Design Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Data sources Eight databases (MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, PEDro, LILACS, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) were searched from inception until March 2021. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Clinical trials that determine the effectiveness of KT with or without co-interventions for clinical outcomes in patients with SIS who are older than 18 years of age. Results Ten trials for the quantitative analysis were included. For pain intensity at 1-3 weeks, the overall pooled MD was -0.73 cm, 95% CI = -1.50 to 0.04 (p = 0.06), and at 3-6 weeks, it was -0.13 cm, 95% CI = -1.37 to 0.36 (p = 0.25). For shoulder function, the MD was -0.02, 95%CI = -0.30 to 0.26 (p = 0.89). For shoulder Range of Motion (ROM) flexion, the MD was -16.70, 95% CI = -0.52 to 33.92 (p = 0.06). Additionally, there was a low to moderate quality of evidence according to the GRADE rating. Conclusion Kinesiotaping with or without co-interventions was not superior to other interventions for improving shoulder pain intensity, function and ROM flexion in patients with SIS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available