4.7 Review

Targeting neurotrophic factors for low back pain and sciatica: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages 2243-2254

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab785

Keywords

back pain; analgesics; drug therapy; monoclonal antibodies; nerve growth factor review; meta-analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. University of New South Wales School of Medical Sciences Postgraduate Research Scholarship
  2. NeuRA Ph.D. Candidature Supplementary Scholarship
  3. Australian Medical Research Future Fund [GNTID1170205]
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  5. University of New South Wales
  6. Neuroscience Research Australia
  7. University of New South Wales Prince of Wales Clinical School Postgraduate Research Scholarship
  8. Australian Government post-graduate award
  9. Australian government research training program scholarship
  10. Rebecca L. Cooper Medical Research Foundation
  11. National Health and Medical Research Council
  12. Medical Research Future Fund of Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analysis examines the efficacy and safety of medicines targeting neurotrophic factors for low back pain (LBP) and sciatica. The findings suggest that anti-nerve growth factor (NGF) medications may offer modest pain relief for chronic LBP, but the effect may vary depending on the dose and type of medication. For sciatica, neither anti-NGF nor glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (pro-GDNF) medications appear to reduce pain. It is important to note that these neurotrophic factor-targeting medications may have different adverse effects compared to commonly prescribed medications for LBP and sciatica.
Objectives This meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of medicines that target neurotrophic factors for low back pain (LBP) or sciatica. Methods We searched published and trial registry reports of randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of medicines that target neurotrophic factors to LBP or sciatica in seven databases from inception to December 2020. Two reviewers independently identified studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and certainty in the evidence. Results Nine studies (3370 participants) were included in the meta-analyses. Low certainty evidence showed that anti-nerve growth factor (NGF) may reduce pain at 4 weeks (mean difference [MD] -6.75, 95% CI: -8.61, -4.90) and 12 weeks (MD -6.16, 95% CI: -8.38, -3.94), and may increase adverse effects for chronic LBP (odds ratio [OR] 1.18, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.38). Higher doses of anti-NGF may offer a clinically important reduction in pain at the cost of increased adverse effects for chronic LBP. Very low certainty evidence showed that anti-NGF and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (pro-GDNF) may not reduce pain for sciatica at 4 weeks (MD -1.40, 95% CI: -8.26, 5.46), at 12 weeks (MD -2.91, 95% CI: -13.69, 7.67) and may increase adverse effects for sciatica (OR 3.27, 95% CI: 1.78, 6.00). Conclusion Anti-NGF may offer small reductions in pain intensity for chronic LBP. The effect may depend on the dose and types of medicines. For sciatica, anti-NGF or pro-GDNF may not reduce pain. Medicines that target neurotrophic factors for LBP or sciatica are associated with different adverse effects compared to those observed in commonly prescribed medicines for these conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available