4.4 Article

METAGENOMIC NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING DETECTS PATHOGENS IN ENDOPHTHALMITIS PATIENTS

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003406

Keywords

metagenomic next-generation sequencing; endophthalmitis; culture; pathogen

Categories

Funding

  1. Guangdong Medical Science and Technology Research Fund Project [A2020185]
  2. Shantou Science and Technology Program [170830171930563]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the use of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in identifying pathogens in endophthalmitis. The results showed that mNGS had a higher positive rate than traditional culture methods and could provide information on antibiotic resistance and visual prognosis.
Purpose: To investigate the utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in identifying the pathogens in endophthalmitis. Methods: In this prospective study, 36 cases of endophthalmitis were recruited. All patients received surgical treatment and intraocular drug lavage. The samples of vitreous or aqueous humor were extracted for mNGS and microbiological culture. The diagnostic performance of pathogens was compared between mNGS and culture. Results: The positive rates of mNGS and culture were 88.89% (32/36) and 27.78% (10/36), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between mNGS and culture (Chi-square = 27.657; P < 0.01). Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the most pathogenic bacteria in traumatic, postoperative, and endogenous endophthalmitis, respectively. The concordance of pathogen identified by mNGS and culture was 70% for culture-positive cases. Antibiotic resistance genes were identified in 9 cases. There was a marginal correlation between the final visual acuity and the microbial sequence read (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.498; P = 0.05). Conclusion: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing has a higher positive rate of identifying pathogens in endophthalmitis than in culture. It can also provide information on antibiotic resistance and visual prognosis. However, caution must be taken when interpreting the results of mNGS because they may not be concordant with culture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available