4.5 Review

Controversy surrounding the Sputnik V vaccine

Journal

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
Volume 187, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106569

Keywords

COVID-19; Vaccines; Variants; SARS-CoV-2; Sputnik V

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Sputnik V COVID-19 vaccine, a vector vaccine, shows high efficacy above 97% in real world data, with the advantages of low cost and no need for ultra-cold storage. However, there are important shortcomings such as potential reduction in immunogenicity, decrease in antibody titres with age, and reduced neutralizing capacity against certain virus variants.
The Sputnik V COVID-19 vaccine is a member of the so-called vector vaccines and uses two different vectors (Ad26 priming and Ad5 boost) to reduce the risk of a reduction in the effectiveness of the vaccination. Real life data indicate an efficacy of the vaccine above 97%. Low cost and no need for ultra-cold storage temperature temperatures are other pluses of the Sputnik V vaccine. However, there are also several important shortcomings that must be considered such as the possible reduction of its immunogenicity in the presence of very high Ad5 neutralizing antibody titres and the decrease with age of the antibody titres neutralizing the virus. Furthermore, there is emerging documentation that Sputnik V has a reduced neutralizing capacity against the Beta variant and all variants with the spike protein carrying the E484K substitution. Nevertheless, due to its characteristics, Sputnik V could be another useful means of satisfying the need for mass vaccination. However, it is imperative to document the efficacy and safety of the Sputnik V vaccine in individuals with high pre-existing anti-Ad26 and Ad5-neutralizing antibody titres and in those under the age of 18 or older than 60 years and be certain that Sputnik V does not cause the rare development of immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. It is hoped that the now widespread use of this vaccine will generate a large pragmatic real-world study with data accessible to anyone interested in verifying them.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available