4.7 Article

Depositing waste in 'certain place' at 'certain time': Does this policy improve recycling performance?

Journal

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
Volume 176, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105935

Keywords

Waste sorting; Certain time certain place; Policy implementation; Behaviour change; Food waste sorting; Household recycling

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M632007]
  2. Vanke Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the Certain Time, Certain Place recycling program did not significantly impact waste sorting performance. Relevant themes included time period arrangements, supervision of waste stations, and attitudes of assistant cleaners. Action Planning and Stakeholder Engagement are suggested to mitigate Inconvenience, but Distance was not found to be a relevant factor.
Food waste produces methane in landfills, accounting for 1.5-2.0% of net global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions in 2010. In developing countries 40-65% of household waste can be food waste, especially from preparation, since pre-prepared food is less common. Different waste management strategies are used worldwide to get householders to separate out their food waste, including the restriction of permitted times and places for depositing household waste (e.g. 6-7pm daily at kerbside, only). Here we evaluate a Certain Time, Certain Place (CTCP) intervention used across a sample of six communities randomly allocated from a cohort in one district of Shanghai. Mixed methods are used, with directly-measured tonnages pre- and post-implementation, and site observations and open interviews of stakeholders to elicit perceived relevant factors. Quantitative results show no statistically significant impact on waste sorting performance. Relevant themes which emerged are: time period arrangements; supervision of waste stations; attitude of the assistant cleaners. These are shown to be related to known determinants of Inconvenience, Role clarification, and Positive interactions. Action Planning and Stakeholder Engagement are suggested as mitigators of Inconvenience, but Distance not found relevant. Such deconstruction of policy elements into scientific factors allows a clear scientific perspective: that this CTCP program was almost pure CT only, which increased Inconvenience without giving overall benefits from increasing supervision. Only one community had CP involved, and its performance increased significantly, suggesting CP should be studied further. In sum, this Certain Place, Certain Time recycling program was actually CT, and is not recommended for increasing food waste sorting performance. The more direct linking of policy elements to scientific factors is suggested as useful for better future design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available