4.7 Article

A sustainable process for selective recovery of lithium as lithium phosphate from spent LiFePO4 batteries

Journal

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
Volume 175, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105883

Keywords

LFP batteries; Lixiviant; Lithium phosphate; Leaching; Recycling

Funding

  1. Queen's University Research Initiation Grant (RIG) [378140Qu]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a novel method for the treatment of cathode powder of spent LiFePO4 batteries, which involves selective leaching of lithium and precipitation of Li3PO4. The developed scheme has been proven suitable for industrial application with economic and environmental benefits. Green chemistry metrics and revenue analysis demonstrate that the process is green, sustainable, and economical.
This work demonstrates a novel, systematic and sustainable route for the treatment of cathode powder of spent LiFePO4 batteries. First time, lithium was selectively leached using formic acid as lixiviant with H2O2 as an oxidant. Effect of different parameters i.e., formic acid and H2O2 concentration, pulp density, temperature and time have been studied. The optimised leaching conditions were used for the selective leaching of Li and Li was precipitated as Li3PO4 in two steps, i.e., firstly, in situ precipitation at pH = 12.5, 60 degrees C and then at pH = 12.5, 90 degrees C using saturated Li(3)PO(4)( )solution from the pregnant leach solution. The products were recovered with high purity (>99.5%) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) and field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) techniques were used for characterization. The overall study confirmed the suitability of the developed scheme for industrial application to provide economic and environmental benefits. Green chemistry metrics and the revenue generated from the developed process were calculated which revealed that the process is indeed green, sustainable, and economic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available