4.6 Article

Comparison of fresh and frozen ejaculated spermatozoa in sibling oocyte recipient cycles

Journal

REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 333-339

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.09.020

Keywords

Delivery rate; Fresh ejaculated sperm; Frozen ejaculated sperm; ICSI; In vitro fertilization; Sibling oocytes

Funding

  1. Clinical and Translational Science Center at Weill Cornell Medical College [1-UL1-TR002384-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared pregnancy outcomes in couples with non-male factor infertility using IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with fresh and frozen ejaculated spermatozoa. Results showed that frozen sperm resulted in lower delivery rates compared to fresh sperm, with significantly higher pregnancy loss rates. Adjusted odds for delivery were lower in the frozen group, while odds for pregnancy and implantation were not significantly different between fresh and frozen sperm groups.
Research question: Do IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles using fresh and frozen ejaculated spermatozoa result in similar pregnancy outcomes in couples with non-male factor infertility? Design: Retrospective cohort study; patients undergoing donor egg recipient cycles, in which oocytes from a single ovarian stimulation were split between two recipients, were reviewed. Two recipients of oocytes from a single donor were paired and categorized based on the type of ejaculated spermatozoa (fresh/frozen). Outcomes included delivery rate, implantation, pregnancy, pregnancy loss and fertilization rates. Results: Of the 408 patients who received oocytes from a split donor oocyte cycle, 45 pairs of patients used discrepant types of ejaculated spermatozoa and were included in the study. Fertilization rate: fresh (74.8%); frozen (68.6%) (P = 0.13). Pregnancy rate: fresh (76%); frozen (67%); delivery rate: fresh (69%); frozen (44%); implantation rate was significantly higher: fresh (64%); frozen (36%) (P = 0.04). Rate of pregnancy loss was significantly higher in the frozen group compared with the fresh group (33% versus 5.9%, P = 0.013). Adjusted odds for delivery was 67% lower in the frozen group (95% CI 0.12, 0.89). Adjusted odds of pregnancy (adjusted OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.20, 2.27) and implantation (adjusted OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.12, 2.12) were not significantly different between the frozen and fresh sperm groups. Conclusion: In this model that controls for oocyte quality by using paired recipients from the same donor, frozen ejaculated spermatozoa resulted in lower delivery rates than those using fresh spermatozoa

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available