4.4 Article

Blood perfusion and diameter of bovine corpus luteum as predictors of luteal function in early pregnancy

Journal

REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages 246-252

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/rda.14046

Keywords

cattle; Doppler ultrasonography; ovary; pregnancy; progesterone

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [MCTIC/CNPq 28/2018, 427786/2018-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that luteal blood perfusion assessment on Day 5 post-TAI can estimate heifers with higher progesterone levels and larger CL sizes. A larger CL diameter is positively associated with a higher pregnancy rate.
A feasible and non-invasive luteal function assessment which enables timely intervention to improve progesterone (P4) support at early pregnancy is not well-established. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation among morphological and functional assessment methods of corpus luteum (CL) on Day 5 (D5) following timed-artificial insemination effect on luteal blood perfusion (LBP), CL diameter and serum P4 concentration. Beef heifers (n = 89) were synchronized and inseminated (D0). On D5, CL was scanned by colour-Doppler ultrasonography using an LBP score (0 = absent; 3 = high blood perfusion); CL diameter was obtained and blood was collected. Diameter of CL had a positive linear effect on P4 concentration (p < .001); and larger CL diameter increased the probability to become pregnant (p < .05; odds ratio =1.21). Heifers with a CL larger than 14.95 mm had a higher pregnancy rate than heifers with a 14.95 mm or smaller CL (p < .05). Animals with LBP 2 and 3 had larger CL when compared to scores 0 and 1 (p < .001). Scores 1, 2 and 3 can accurately estimate heifers with higher P4 (accuracy =0.79, 0.72 and 0.61 respectively). In conclusion, LBP on Day 5 post-TAI allows to estimate heifers with higher P4 and larger CL size, and a larger CL diameter was positively associated with pregnancy rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available