4.7 Article

Carbon uptake dynamics associated to the management of unused lands for urban CO2 planning

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 178, Issue -, Pages 946-959

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.124

Keywords

Carbon uptake; Reforestation; Unused lands; SECAPs; SEAPs; Sustainability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the carbon uptake dynamics generated by managing unused lands to fulfill international commitments on atmospheric CO2. Using a genetic algorithm, the paper identifies operational sequences to ensure specific outcomes in carbon capture, providing a new perspective on compensating for urban carbon emissions.
Trees absorb CO2 and reduce the impact of GHGs. This paper deals about the carbon uptake dynamics produced by the management of unused lands as tool to help the fulfilment of international commitments on atmospheric CO2. The paper introduces a new perspective of using the unused lands around Municipalities to compensate the carbon emissions of urban contexts, according to the Sustainable Energy Action Plans as answer to climate change, already approved by the most part of Cities in Europe. The model of the carbon dynamics is based on a genetic algorithm which allows to find the sequence of operations on the unused land in space (portions of the land) and time (rotation of cuts and plantations) to ensure the reaching of a given outcome in terms of carbon captured. The algorithm, therefore, behaves as design support of land management, enriching the literature available for the sector. The paper identifies two possible original scenarios of storing carbon referred as emergency and constant rate; the first produces after fifty years a maximum carbon uptake of the order of 100 tC/ha while the second a maximum uptake rate of the order of 2 tC/(year ha), after an initial start-up period of 40-50 years. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available