4.7 Article

Influence of particle loading, Froude and Stokes number on the global thermal performance of a vortex-based solar particle receiver

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 184, Issue -, Pages 201-214

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.042

Keywords

CST; Particle receiver technology; CFD; Vortex flow; Particle size; Heat transfer

Funding

  1. Australian Renewable Energy Agency, ARENA [RND054]
  2. Faculty of ECMS, University of Adelaide

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a joint experimental and numerical investigation of the global thermal performance of a novel windowless vortex-based cavity receiver. The research focuses on the potential thermal processing of suspended particles and evaluates the coupled influence of particle loading, Froude and Stokes number on the overall performance. The results suggest that particle volumetric loading and Froude number are the primary controlling factors for the global performance of the receiver.
We report a joint experimental and numerical study on the global thermal performance of a novel windowless vortex-based cavity receiver for potential thermal processing of suspended particles. This systematic study assesses the coupled influence of particle loading, Froude and Stokes number through variation of the inlet mass flowrate, particle size and loading on the global performance of the Solar Expanding Vortex Receiver-Reactor (SEVR) under steady-state conditions. The experiments employ polydispersed CARBO CP ceramic particles that are heated with an 18-kW(el) Metal Halide three-lamp solar simulator. A numerical study was also performed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software ANSYS/CFX 2019 R1. It was found that the particle volumetric loading and Froude number have primary controlling influence, while the Stokes number has a secondary influence on the global performance for these conditions. An overall thermal efficiency of 67% was obtained under high particle loading and Froude numbers. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available