4.7 Article

Temperature dependence of rock salt thermal conductivity: Implications for geothermal exploration

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 184, Issue -, Pages 26-35

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.080

Keywords

Geothermal energy; Salt; Evaporite; Sylvite; Heat conduction; Magdalen Islands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rock salt has high thermal conductivity, making it favorable for low enthalpy geothermal resources, but its thermal conductivity is greatly affected by temperature. This temperature dependence should be considered in geothermal potential assessments.
Rock salt has high thermal conductivity (> 6 W m-1 K-1 at 20 degrees C) compared to most overlying and adjacent sedimentary rocks, resulting in a thermal blanket effect and a favorable play for low enthalpy geothermal resources. However, the effect of temperature on rock salt thermal conductivity is greater than most other rocks. The result can be a reduction in this contrast between rock types, which has implications for geothermal exploration. The temperature dependence of rock salt thermal conductivity was shown to be a critical factor in our geothermal potential assessment of the Magdalen Islands (Canada). We evaluated the subsurface temperature of this archipelago using numerical simulations of conductive heat transfer, specifying a bulk thermal conductivity of rocks that varies with temperature and porosity, and the latter varying with pressure. A steep geothermal gradient, locally exceeding 40 degrees C km -1, was found in layers overlying shallow salt domes at depths of ~1 km but not over a deeper dome due to low thermal conductivity contrasts. This finding highlights the effect of temperature on rock salt thermal conductivity, which should be considered when assessing the geothermal potential of salt domes, intrusions or diapirs, to avoid overestimating the subsurface temperature. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Superscript/Subscript Available

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available