4.7 Article

Clearness index forecasting: A comparative study between a stochastic realization method and a machine learning algorithm

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 180, Issue -, Pages 787-805

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.08.094

Keywords

Solar radiation; Clearness index; k-nearest neighbors; Short-term prediction; Long-term prediction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper proposes two methods for predicting solar radiation clearness index (CI), one solving a stochastic realization problem to find a mathematical model and implementing a state observer for prediction, the other using k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN) regression algorithm with two different approaches. Results show that the accuracy of these methods varies for different prediction horizons.
With the increase in solar energy penetration in electric power systems, it is necessary to predict future solar radiation. With this, the solar power generation capacity can be predicted, allowing accurate scheduling for other sources. The solar radiation or the clearness index (CI) prediction was already presented using classical time series methods, artificial intelligence algorithms, among other approaches. In this paper, two methods are proposed to predict the CI. The first one solves a stochastic realization problem to find a mathematical model for the stochastic process that describes the CI. Then, a state observer is implemented to predict its future values. The second one performs the k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN) regression algorithm for time series forecasting using two different approaches: the traditional k NN and a recursive version proposed by the authors. As far as the authors know, the statistical and the recursive k-NN methods are different from the ones found in the literature to predict the CI. The methods were implemented and compared for short and long-term predictions. The results illustrate that one approach is more accurate than the other, depending on the prediction horizon. The comparison between the methods for different horizons is another contribution of this paper. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available