4.8 Review

Techno-economic review of alternative fuels and propulsion systems for the aviation sector

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 151, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111564

Keywords

Future aviation fuels; Aircraft propulsion; Cost; Biofuels; Electrofuels; Hydrogen

Funding

  1. Swedish Energy Agency
  2. Swedish Knowledge Centre for Renewable Transportation Fuels (f3) [collaborative research program Renewable transportation fuels and systems program (Samverkansprogrammet Fornybara drivmedel och system)] [P48357-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Substitution of conventional jet fuel with low-to zero-carbon-emitting alternative aviation fuels is crucial for meeting climate targets in aviation. This study reviews alternative fuels and propulsion systems, focusing on costs and technical maturity, and presents conceptual aircraft designs for different aviation fuels. The overall cost is a key factor for future implementation, with renewable aviation fuels showing higher DOC than conventional jet fuels, and bio-jet fuels offering the lowest MJFSP among alternative options.
Substitution of conventional jet fuel with low-to zero-carbon-emitting alternative aviation fuels is vital for meeting the climate targets for aviation. It is important to understand the technical, environmental, and economic performance of alternative aviation fuels and prospective engine and propulsion technologies for future aircraft. This study reviews alternative fuels and propulsion systems, focusing on costs and technical maturity, and presents conceptual aircraft designs for different aviation fuels. The cost review includes minimum jet fuel selling price (MJFSP) for alternative aviation fuels. Direct operating cost (DOC) is estimated based on the conceptual aircraft designs and the reviewed MJFSP. The DOCs for bio-jet fuel (5.0-9.2 US cent per passengerkilometer (cent/PAX/km)), fossil and renewable liquefied hydrogen (5.9-10.1 and 8.1-23.9 cent/PAX/km, respectively), and electro-methane and electro-jet fuel (5.6-16.7 and 9.2-23.7 cent/PAX/km, respectively) are higher than for conventional jet fuel (3.9-4.8 cent/PAX/km) and liquefied natural gas (4.2-5.2 cent/PAX/km). Overall, DOC of renewable aviation fuels is 15-500 % higher than conventional jet fuels. Among the bio-jet fuels, hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (23-310 $/GJ) and alcohol-to-jet (4-215 $/GJ) pathways offer the lowest MJFSPs. The implementation of alternative fuels in existing aircraft engines and the design and development of appropriate propulsion systems and aircraft are challenging. The overall cost is a key factor for future implementation. Bio-jet fuel is most promising in the near term while hydrogen and electrofuels in the long term. The level of carbon tax on fossil jet fuels needed for the latter options to be competitive depend on the hydrogen production cost.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available