4.8 Review

Valuing wind as a distributed energy resource: A literature review

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111678

Keywords

Distributed wind; Valuation; Distributed energy resources; Value elements; Value-based tariffs; Value-of-resource; Resource diversity

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Ener-gy's Wind Energy Technologies Office
  2. U.S. Department of Energy by Battelle [DE-AC05-76RL01830]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper focuses on the value of wind energy as a distributed energy resource and analyzes the current state of distributed energy resource valuation. The study recommends developing more robust calculation methodologies for potential inclusion of various value elements in distributed wind valuation.
As more distributed energy resources are deployed on electric grid systems across the world, it is important to identify, characterize, and quantify the value elements of different types of distributed energy resources so that policymakers, developers, and utilities can make informed energy deployment decisions. This paper focuses on the value of wind energy as a distributed energy resource (i.e., distributed wind). Because of a lack of distributed wind-specific valuation studies, in this review we document the current state of distributed energy resource valuation, analyze a wide array of distributed energy resource valuation metastudies, and identify several value elements for which we recommend developing more robust and standardized calculation methodologies for their potential inclusion in distributed wind valuation. These value elements are ancillary services and locational, resilience, reliability, and resource diversity benefits. This work lays the foundation for a future comprehensive framework for distributed wind valuation studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available