4.8 Review

A review of very short-term wind and solar power forecasting

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 153, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111758

Keywords

Forecasting; Wind power; Solar power; Renewable energy; Probabilistic forecasting; Open data

Funding

  1. Data Lab Innovation Centre
  2. Natural Power Consultants Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Installed capacities of wind and solar power have been growing rapidly in recent years, leading to an increase in literature on short-term wind and solar forecasting. This paper reviews established and emerging approaches in this field, discussing knowledge transfer and new opportunities, particularly in the use of remote sensing technology. Comparisons are made on forecasting methodologies and study design, with recommendations for high-quality and reproducible results.
Installed capacities of wind and solar power have grown rapidly over recent years, and the pool of literature on very short-term (minutes-to hours-ahead) wind and solar forecasting has grown in line with this. This paper reviews established and emerging approaches to provide an up-to-date view of the field. Knowledge transfer between wind and solar forecasting has benefited the field and is discussed, and new opportunities are identified, particularly regarding use of remote sensing technology. Forecasting methodologies and study design are compared and recommendations for high quality, reproducible results are presented. In particular, the choice of suitable benchmarks and use of sufficiently long datasets is highlighted. A case study of three distinct approaches to probabilistic wind power forecasting is presented using an open dataset. The case study provides an example of exemplary forecast evaluation, and open source code allows for its reproduction and use in future work.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available