4.7 Article

Fossil fuel CO2 emissions over metropolitan areas from space: A multi-model analysis of OCO-2 data over Lahore, Pakistan

Journal

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
Volume 264, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112625

Keywords

GHGs; Quality flags; WRF-Chem; X-STILT; Flux cross-sectional integration; Bayesian inversion; ODIAC

Funding

  1. NASA [80NSSC18K1313, 80NSSC19k0093, 80NSSC19K0196]
  2. NASA at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) [80HQTR21T0070]
  3. DOE [DE-AC06-76RLO 1830]
  4. French research program Make Our Planet Great Again (project CIUDAD)
  5. Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives
  6. French National Space Agency (CNES) as part of the TOSCA program (OCO-3 City project)
  7. NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory
  8. Universities Space Research Association [05783-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urban areas contribute over 70% of anthropogenic fossil fuel carbon dioxide emissions, making accurate quantification of these emissions crucial for global warming mitigation policies. Satellite-based inversion techniques offer a unique way to track emission changes globally, but face challenges with accuracy due to various factors. More high-quality satellite data near metropolitan areas is needed to improve detection of CO2 emission trends.
Urban areas, where more than 55% of the global population gathers, contribute more than 70% of anthropogenic fossil fuel carbon dioxide (CO2ff) emissions. Accurate quantification of CO2ff emissions from urban areas is of great importance for formulating global warming mitigation policies to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050. Satellite-based inversion techniques are unique among top-down approaches, potentially allowing us to track CO2ff emission changes over cities globally. However, their accuracy is still limited by incomplete background information, cloud blockages, aerosol contamination, and uncertainties in models and priori emission inventories. To evaluate the current potential of space-based quantification techniques, we present the first attempt to monitor long-term changes in CO(2ff )emissions based on the OCO-2 satellite measurements of column-averaged dry-air mole fractions of CO2 (X-CO2) over a fast-growing Asian metropolitan area: Lahore, Pakistan. We first examined the OCO-2 data availability at global scale. About 17% of OCO-2soundings over the global 70 most populated cities from 2014 to 2019 are marked as high-quality. Cloud blockage and aerosol contamination are the two main causes of data loss. As an attempt to recover additional soundings, we evaluated the effectiveness of OCO-2 quality flags at the city level by comparing three flux quantification methods (WRF-Chem, X-STILT, and the flux cross-sectional integration method). The satellite/bottom-up emissions (OCO-2/ODIAC) ratios of the high-quality tracks with reduced uncertainties in emissions are better agreed across the three methods compared to the all-data tracks. This demonstrates that OCO-2 quality flags are useful filters of low-quality OCO-2 retrievals at local scales. All three methods consistently suggested that the ratio medians are greater than 1, implying that the ODIAC slightly underestimated CO2ff emissions over Lahore. Additionally, our estimation of the a posteriori CO2ff emission trend was about 734 kt C/year (i.e., an annual 6.7% increase). 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations of the Mann-Kendall upward trend test showed that less than 10% prior uncertainty for 8 tracks (or less than 20% prior uncertainty for 25 tracks) is required to achieve a greater-than-50% trend significant possibility at a 95% confidence level. It implies that the trend is driven by the prior and not due to the assimilation of OCO-2 retrievals. The key to improving the role of satellite data in CO2 emission trend detection lies in collecting more frequent high-quality tracks near metropolitan areas to achieve significant constraints from X-CO2 retrievals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available