4.7 Article

Reliability evaluation of demand-based warm standby systems with capacity storage

Journal

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
Volume 218, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108132

Keywords

Reliability evaluation; Warm standby systems; Capacity storage; Multi-valued decision diagram

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [72001078, 72071005, 72101010]
  2. National Key Laboratory Foundation [KZ42004001, ZG216S21C3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel reliability model for demand-based warm standby systems with capacity storage is formulated in this study, exploring the chronological characteristics of warm standby components and analyzing the effects on system reliability. A multi-valued decision diagram is developed to evaluate system reliability considering successful activation probabilities of warm standby components.
Warm standby is an energy-saving redundancy technique that consumes less energy than a conventional hot standby method. It can be naturally integrated with an energy storage technique to enhance system reliability. However, the integration approach of both techniques and the advantage it affords to system reliability have not been reported in literature. This study resolves this limitation by formulating a novel reliability model for demand-based warm standby systems with capacity storage. In this model, the chronological characteristics of warm standby components are explicitly explored before and after their activation. Moreover, different utilization sequences of warm standby components and storage components are embedded to analyze the effects of these sequences on system reliability. A multi-valued decision diagram is developed to evaluate system reliability considering successful activation probabilities of warm standby components. This diagram is applicable to arbitrary component lifetime distributions and warm standby systems. Numerical examples are presented to verify the application of the proposed methodology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available