4.7 Article

Estimation of the value of an inspection and maintenance program: A Bayesian gamma process model

Journal

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
Volume 216, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107912

Keywords

Value of information; Gamma process; Bayesian updating; Inspection; Preventive maintenance; Life cycle cost; Temporal uncertainty; Parameter uncertainty

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. University Network of Excellence in Nuclear Engineering (UNENE), Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a model to quantify the economic value gained by implementation of an inspection and preventive maintenance program, emphasizing the intricate interaction between parameter and temporal uncertainties associated with the degradation process. The research shows that the economic value is significantly sensitive to the prior information and relative costs of preventive and corrective maintenance.
This paper presents a model to quantify the economic value gained by implementation of an inspection and preventive maintenance program for managing an ageing component population. The proposed approach is a refinement of the Bayesian value of information analysis through the consideration of an intricate interaction between parameter and temporal uncertainties associated with the gamma process of degradation. This paper presents an analytical formulation and computational approach to solve this complex problem in a multivariate setting. The paper shows that the economic value is significantly sensitive to the prior information and relative costs of preventive and corrective maintenance. Since the value of inspection is dominated by a reduction in the parameter uncertainty of the gamma process model, lifecycle cost optimization which ignores this aspect would lead to a sub-optimal solution of the problem.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available