4.5 Article

Dose-dependent effects of high intensity focused ultrasound on compound action potentials in an ex vivo rodent peripheral nerve model: comparison to local anesthetics

Journal

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages 242-248

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2021-103115

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research Mentored Research Training Grant (Washington D.C.)
  2. DOD CDMRP grant [13113162]
  3. NIH [UG3NS11563701, R21NS08884102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the effects of focused ultrasound and local anesthetics on action potential parameters were investigated in an ex vivo rat sciatic nerve model. Both focused ultrasound and local anesthetics were found to alter some action potential parameters, but there were small differences between the two. Further research is needed to determine the clinical implications of these findings and the potential use of focused ultrasound for pain management.
Background In animal models, focused ultrasound can reversibly or permanently inhibit nerve conduction, suggesting a potential role in managing pain. We hypothesized focused ultrasound's effects on action potential parameters may be similar to those of local anesthetics. Methods In an ex vivo rat sciatic nerve model, action potential amplitude, area under the curve, latency to 10% peak, latency to 100% peak, rate of rise, and half peak width changes were assessed after separately applying increasing focused ultrasound pressures or concentrations of bupivacaine and ropivacaine. Focused ultrasound's effects on nerve structure were examined histologically. Results Increasing focused ultrasound pressures decreased action potential amplitude, area under the curve, and rate of rise, increased latency to 10% peak, and did not change latency to 100% peak or half peak width. Increasing local anesthetic concentrations decreased action potential amplitude, area under the curve, and rate of rise and increased latency to 10% peak, latency to 100% peak, and half peak width. At the highest focused ultrasound pressures, nerve architecture was altered compared with controls. Discussion While some action potential parameters were altered comparably by focused ultrasound and local anesthetics, there were small but notable differences. It is not evident if these differences may lead to differences in clinical pain effects when focused ultrasound is applied in vivo or if focused ultrasound pressures that result in clinically relevant changes damage nerve structures. Given the potential advantages of a non-invasive technique for managing pain conditions, further investigation may be warranted in an in vivo pain model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available