4.6 Article

Does restaging MRI radiomics analysis improve pathological complete response prediction in rectal cancer patients? A prognostic model development

Journal

RADIOLOGIA MEDICA
Volume 127, Issue 1, Pages 11-20

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-021-01421-0

Keywords

Rectal cancer; Neoadjuvant chemoradiation; Radiomics; Response prediction; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multidisciplinary tumor board

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that radiomics analysis performed well in identifying complete responders, and when combined with standard clinical evaluation, it improved the prediction of clinical response. The increase in performance was not statistically significant, but showed potential for enhancing predictive capabilities.
Purpose Our study investigated the contribution that the application of radiomics analysis on post-treatment magnetic resonance imaging can add to the assessments performed by an experienced disease-specific multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) for the prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Materials and methods This analysis included consecutively retrospective LARC patients who obtained a complete or near-complete response after nCRT and/or a pCR after surgery between January 2010 and September 2019. A three-step radiomics features selection was performed and three models were generated: a radiomics model (rRM), a multidisciplinary tumor board model (yMTB) and a combined model (CM). The predictive performance of models was quantified using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, evaluating the area under curve (AUC). Results The analysis involved 144 LARC patients; a total of 232 radiomics features were extracted from the MR images acquired post-nCRT. The yMTB, rRM and CM predicted pCR with an AUC of 0.82, 0.73 and 0.84, respectively. ROC comparison was not significant (p = 0.6) between yMTB and CM. Conclusion Radiomics analysis showed good performance in identifying complete responders, which increased when combined with standard clinical evaluation; this increase was not statistically significant but did improve the prediction of clinical response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available