4.6 Article

New concept of radiolytic synthesis of gold nanoparticles in continuous flow

Journal

RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 188, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109614

Keywords

Gold; Nanoparticles; Radiolytic synthesis; X-rays; Branched polyethyleneimine; Continuous flow

Funding

  1. Faculty Development Program in Radiation Detection and Health Physics at Virginia Commonwealth University [NRC-HQ-84-14-FOA-002]
  2. Virginia Commonwealth University
  3. Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering Department

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Radiolytic synthesis has been successfully used to produce gold nanoparticles in continuous flow, demonstrating the potential for high-throughput formation of metallic nanoparticles under short reaction times, room temperature, and low concentrations of stabilizing and reducing agents.
Radiolytic synthesis has been used to produce a plethora of unsupported and supported metallic nanoparticles in batch. As proof of a new concept, we evaluated the formation of gold nanoparticles by radiolytic synthesis in continuous flow using a millifluidic reactor. A mixture of gold ions solution, branched polyethyleneimine, and ethylene glycol yielded gold nanoparticles with a mean size of 3.4 +/- 1.0 nm after irradiation with an X-ray irradiator (127 Gy/min) at an absorbed dose of 5.1 kGy. The morphology and size distribution of gold nano particles was influenced by AgNO3, where its absence resulted in a mean size of 20.9 +/- 15.8 nm. The radiolytic synthesis of gold nanoparticles in continuous flow was achieved in short reaction times (<60 min), at room temperature, and with low concentrations of both stabilizing and reducing agents. These results demonstrate the potential of radiolytic synthesis in continuous flow for high-throughput formation of metallic nanoparticles with controlled specifications in size and distribution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available