4.5 Article

Evaluation of a treatment planning system developed for clinical boron neutron capture therapy and validation against an independent Monte Carlo dose calculation system

Journal

RADIATION ONCOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01968-2

Keywords

Boron neutron capture therapy; Treatment planning system; Commissioning; Monte Carlo simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) has been approved for the treatment of unresectable, locally advanced, and recurrent head and neck cancer by the Japanese government. A new treatment planning system, NeuCure (R) Dose Engine, has been developed for clinical BNCT. Comparisons between simulated and experimental results show the system's safety and efficacy, with close matches in dose distribution inside a head phantom.
Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) for the treatment of unresectable, locally advanced, and recurrent carcinoma of the head and neck cancer has been approved by the Japanese government for reimbursement under the national health insurance as of June 2020. A new treatment planning system for clinical BNCT has been developed by Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd. (Sumitomo), NeuCure (R) Dose Engine(.) To safely implement this system for clinical use, the simulated neutron flux and gamma ray dose rate inside a water phantom was compared against experimental measurements. Furthermore, to validate and verify the new planning system, the dose distribution inside an anthropomorphic head phantom was compared against a BNCT treatment planning system SERA and an in-house developed Monte Carlo dose calculation program. The simulated results closely matched the experimental results, within 5% for the thermal neutron flux and 10% for the gamma ray dose rate. The dose distribution inside the head phantom closely matched with SERA and the in-house developed dose calculation program, within 3% for the tumour and a difference of 0.3 Gy(w) for the brain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available