4.2 Article

Representations underlying pronoun choice in Italian and English

Journal

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 75, Issue 8, Pages 1428-1447

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/17470218211051989

Keywords

Language production; referential communication; similarity-based competition

Funding

  1. Leverhulme Trust [RPG-2016-253]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research has shown that speakers use fewer pronouns when the referential candidates are more similar and compete more strongly, with the competition being influenced by non-linguistic factors. The type of pronoun used also plays a role in how similarity affects non-linguistic competition.
Research has shown that speakers use fewer pronouns when the referential candidates are more similar and hence compete more strongly. Here we examined the locus of such an effect, investigating (1) whether pronoun use is affected by the referents' competition at a non-linguistic level only (non-linguistic competition account) or whether it is also affected by competition arising from the antecedents' similarities (linguistic competition account) and (2) the extent to which this depends on the type of pronoun. Speakers used Italian null pronouns and English pronouns less often (relative to full nouns) when the referential candidates compete more strongly situationally, while the antecedents' semantic, grammatical or phonological similarity did not affect the rates of either pronouns, providing support for the non-linguistic competition account. However, unlike English pronouns, Italian null pronouns were unaffected by gender congruence between human referents, running counter to the gender effect for the use of non-gendered overt pronouns reported earlier. Hence, while both null and overt pronouns are sensitive to non-linguistic competition, what similarity affects non-linguistic competition partly depends on the type of pronouns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available