4.5 Article

Intra-individual stability of hair endocannabinoid and N-acylethanolamine concentrations

Journal

PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 133, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2021.105395

Keywords

Endocannabinoid; Human hair; Biomarker; Stability; Reliability; Mass spectrometry

Funding

  1. DeutscheForschungsgemeinschaft, Germany [GA 2772/2-1, SFB 940/2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study measured hair endocannabinoid and N-acylethanolamine levels over a period of two and a half years in 100 female participants, with strong test-retest associations found and no correlations observed between perceived stress and the measured substances. The findings support the idea that endocannabinoids and N-acylethanolamines in hair are stable trait biomarkers over time.
Hair analysis of endocannabinoids and N-acylethanolamines presents a promising methodological advancement for the retrospective assessment of long-term cumulative endocannabinoids and N-acylethanolamines secretion over extended periods of time. A main assumption of this method application that hair endocannabinoid and Nacylethanolamine concentrations show intra-individual stability has not been confirmed yet. Thus, in the current study hair endocannabinoid and N-acylethanolamine levels were measured over a period of two and a half years with six months between each hair sample collection in 100 female participants. We found strong test-retest associations of hair endocannabinoid and N-acylethanolamine levels with intraclass correlation coefficients between 0.79 and 0.92. Furthermore, no correlations between perceived stress and hair endocannabinoids or Nacylethanolamines was observed. The current findings support the notion that endocannabinoids and N-acylethanolamines in hair are rather trait biomarkers that are stable over a considerable period of time rather than rapidly changing state markers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available