4.7 Article

Evaluating the perceived utility of an artificial intelligence-powered clinical decision support system for depression treatment using a simulation center

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 308, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114336

Keywords

Major depressive disorder; Artificial intelligence; Primary care; Outpatient treatment; Physician-patient relationship; Simulation center; Patient-Physician Relationship

Categories

Funding

  1. Aifred Health Inc.
  2. Innovation Research Assistance Program, National Research Council Canada
  3. ERA-Permed Vision 2020 supporting IMADAPT
  4. Government of Quebec Nova Science
  5. MEDTEQ COVIDRelief Grant
  6. Hakim family

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the perceived utility of the Aifred CDSS in aiding treatment decisions for major depressive disorder, with 60% of physicians finding it useful, especially family physicians. Half of the physicians would use the tool for all depression patients, while an additional 35% would reserve it for more severe or treatment-resistant cases. The CDSS was also found to be helpful in discussing treatment options with patients.
Aifred is a clinical decision support system (CDSS) that uses artificial intelligence to assist physicians in selecting treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD) by providing probabilities of remission for different treatment options based on patient characteristics. We evaluated the utility of the CDSS as perceived by physicians participating in simulated clinical interactions. Twenty physicians who were either staff or residents in psychiatry or family medicine completed a study in which they had three 10-minute clinical interactions with standardized patients portraying mild, moderate, and severe episodes of MDD. During these scenarios, physicians were given access to the CDSS, which they could use in their treatment decisions. The perceived utility of the CDSS was assessed through self-report questionnaires, scenario observations, and interviews. 60% of physicians perceived the CDSS to be a useful tool in their treatment-selection process, with family physicians perceiving the greatest utility. Moreover, 50% of physicians would use the tool for all patients with depression, with an additional 35% noting that they would reserve the tool for more severe or treatment-resistant patients. Furthermore, clinicians found the tool to be useful in discussing treatment options with patients. The efficacy of this CDSS and its potential to improve treatment outcomes must be further evaluated in clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available