4.4 Article

Differential pulp cell wall structures lead to diverse fruit textures in apple (Malus domestica)

Journal

PROTOPLASMA
Volume 259, Issue 5, Pages 1205-1217

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00709-021-01727-w

Keywords

Apple; Cell wall polysaccharides; Fruit texture; Immunofluorescence labeling; Pectin

Funding

  1. Special Project for the Construction of Modern Agricultural Industrial Technology System of China [CARS-28]
  2. Science and Technology Innovation Project of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences [CAAS-ASTIP-2016-RIP-02]
  3. Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences [2020FJZX039]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study elucidated the effect of pulp cell wall structure on fruit hardness and crispness in apples. The differences between Hanfu and Honeycrisp varieties were identified, providing insights into the underlying mechanism of fruit texture formation in apples.
In this study, we aimed to elucidate the effect of pulp cell wall structure on fruit hardness and crispness in apples. To this end, we studied the cell wall polysaccharides in two apple varieties, Hanfu and Honeycrisp, during fruit development. Compared with Hanfu, the crispness of Honeycrisp was higher, whereas its harness was lower. The intensity and distribution of immunofluorescence signals indicated that galactose and arabinose contributed to the higher hardness of Hanfu, whereas arabinose, egg-box structure, and fucosylated xyloglucans, distributed in the corners of tricellular junctions, enhanced the cell-cell adhesion and improved the crispness of Honeycrisp. Besides, fucosylated xyloglucan played an important role in promoting the formation and maintaining the strength of the cell wall skeleton and, consequently, retaining the fruit crispness. The esterification state of pectin had little effect on the fruit hardness and crispness in both varieties. Collectively, our findings provided information on the underlying mechanism of fruit texture formation in apples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available