4.5 Article

A peptidoform based proteomic strategy for studying functions of post-translational modifications

Journal

PROTEOMICS
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.202100316

Keywords

bottom-up proteomics; label-free quantification; peptidoform; post-translational modification analysis; proteoform; technology

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01GM137031]
  3. Yale Cancer Center
  4. Yale Cancer Center and a Career Enhancement Program Grant from the Yale SPORE in Lung Cancer [1P50CA196530]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein post-translational modifications (PTMs) play a crucial role in generating diverse proteoforms, yet current studies mainly focus on PTM site-specific rather than proteoform-specific approaches. The suggested matching strategy between modified and unmodified peptidoforms could offer more relevant information for understanding PTM site-specific biological functions. The use of peptidoform nomenclature is advocated for future bottom-up proteomic studies.
Protein post-translational modifications (PTMs) generate an enormous, but as yet undetermined, expansion of the produced proteoforms. In this Viewpoint, we firstly reviewed the concepts of proteoform and peptidoform. We show that many of the current PTM biological investigation and annotation studies largely follow a PTM site-specific rather than proteoform-specific approach. We further illustrate a potentially useful matching strategy in which a particular modified peptidoform is matched to the corresponding unmodified peptidoform as a reference for the quantitative analysis between samples and conditions. We suggest this strategy has the potential to provide more directly relevant information to learn the PTM site-specific biological functions. Accordingly, we advocate for the wider use of the nomenclature peptidoform in future bottom-up proteomic studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available