4.5 Article

A pre-processing pipeline to quantify, visualize, and reduce technical variation in protein microarray studies

Journal

PROTEOMICS
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.202100033

Keywords

Bland-Atlman plots; measurement agreement; normalization; proteomics

Funding

  1. National Institute ofAllergy and Infectious Diseases [U19-AI089680]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Technical variation exists in most laboratory assays, and correcting for this variation is important for extracting biological signals. The choice of correction methods can impact downstream analyses. Protein microarrays, a versatile tool for measuring levels of various proteins in serum samples, have relatively few developed and evaluated methods compared to DNA microarrays. A pre-processing pipeline is proposed to correct for common sources of technical variation in protein microarrays.
Technical variation, or variation from non-biological sources, is present in most laboratory assays. Correcting for this variation enables analysts to extract a biological signal that informs questions of interest. However, each assay has different sources and levels of technical variation, and the choice of correction methods can impact downstream analyses. Compared to similar assays such as DNA microarrays, relatively few methods have been developed and evaluated for protein microarrays, a versatile tool for measuring levels of various proteins in serum samples. Here, we propose a pre-processing pipeline to correct for some common sources of technical variation in protein microarrays. The pipeline builds upon an existing normalization method by using controls to reduce technical variation. We evaluate our method using data from two protein microarray studies and by simulation. We demonstrate that pre-processing choices impact the fluorescent-intensity based ranks of proteins, which in turn, impact downstream analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available