4.7 Article

Assess the performance of chemical coagulation process for microplastics removal from stormwater

Journal

PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Volume 155, Issue -, Pages 11-16

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2021.09.002

Keywords

Coagulation; Humic substances; Microplastics; Marine environments; Stormwater

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the effectiveness of the coagulation process in removing microplastic particles, especially under low pH and weathering conditions. A combination of alum and PAM proved to be the most effective coagulant for removing low-density polyethylene, high-density polyethylene, and polypropylene.
Microplastic (MP) is considered as one of the emerging pollutants in marine environments. Because of low density and small particle size (<5 mm), MPs are easily discharged into open waterways by stormwater runoff. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of coagulation process for the removal of different types of MPs such as low-density polyethylene (LDPE), high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and polypropylene (PP) from synthetic stormwater. The effect of different types of a coagulant such as alum and polyacrylamide (PAM), dosages of coagulants, solution pH and weathering conditions was investigated for the removal of MPs. Results found that a combination of alum and PAM performed better than standalone coagulant for MPs removal. The removal of all three types of MPs was high at low pH (3-5). It is also found that the removal efficiency of LDPE, HDPE and PP was 92 %, 84 % and 96 %, respectively under the weathering conditions. The mechanisms for MP removal were charge neutralization and hydrophobic interaction between MP and coagulant flocs. Overall, this study has confirmed that the coagulation process was very effective for removing MP particles under weathering conditions. (c) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available