4.7 Article

Evidence for a vocal signature in the rat and its reinforcing effects: a key role for the subthalamic nucleus

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2260

Keywords

ultrasonic vocalizations; familiarity; cocaine; basal ganglia; reinforcement; animal models

Funding

  1. CNRS
  2. Aix-Marseille Universite (AMU)
  3. French ministry of Higher Education and Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies show that rats can recognize the identity of the emitter of 50 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations and that only stranger rats' 50 kHz USVs can reduce cocaine self-administration. Additionally, rats with subthalamic nucleus lesions show decreased lever pressing for USV playback and an inability to differentiate between familiar and stranger peers.
Although rodents have a well-structured vocal form of communication, like humans and non-human primates, there is, to date, no evidence for a vocal signature in the well-known 50- and 22-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) emitted by rats. Here, we show that rats can recognize the identity of the USV emitter since they choose to preferentially self-administer playback of 50-kHz USVs emitted by a stranger rat over those of their cagemate. In a second experiment, we show that only stranger, but not familiar, 50-kHz USVs reduce cocaine self-administration. Finally, to study the neurobiological substrate of these processes, we have shown that subthalamic nucleus (STN)-lesioned rats did not lever press much for any USV playback, whatever their emotional valence, nor did they seem able to differentiate familiar from stranger peer. Advocating for the existence of a vocal signature in rats, these results highlight the importance of ultrasonic communication in the socio-affective influence of behaviour, such as the influence of proximal social factors on drug consumption and confirm the role of the STN on this influence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available