4.8 Article

Sensory computations in the cuneate nucleus of macaques

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2115772118

Keywords

touch; neural coding; receptive fields; vibration; integration

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NS122333, NS095162, NS096952]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are distinct differences in how tactile nerve fibers and cortical neurons process tactile information, with responses in the cuneate nucleus (CN) being more similar to cortical counterparts. The CN plays a key role in processing tactile information, contrary to the traditional view that sensory signals are mainly processed in the cortex.
Tactile nerve fibers fall into a few classes that can be readily distinguished based on their spatiotemporal response properties. Because nerve fibers reflect local skin deformations, they individually carry ambiguous signals about object features. In contrast, cortical neurons exhibit heterogeneous response properties that reflect computations applied to convergent input from multiple classes of afferents, which confer to them a selectivity for behaviorally relevant features of objects. The conventional view is that these complex response properties arise within the cortex itself, implying that sensory signals are not processed to any significant extent in the two intervening structures-the cuneate nucleus (CN) and the thalamus. To test this hypothesis, we recorded the responses evoked in the CN to a battery of stimuli that have been extensively used to characterize tactile coding in both the periphery and cortex, including skin indentations, vibrations, random dot patterns, and scanned edges. We found that CN responses are more similar to their cortical counterparts than they are to their inputs: CN neurons receive input from multiple classes of nerve fibers, they have spatially complex receptive fields, and they exhibit selectivity for object features. Contrary to consensus, then, the CN plays a key role in processing tactile information.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available