4.8 Article

Convergence of undulatory swimming kinematics across a diversity of fishes

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2113206118

Keywords

fish locomotion; biomechanics; BCF; swimming modes; undulatory swimming

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research [N000141410533, N00014-15-1-2234]
  2. NSF [PRFB1907156, 093088-17158, (IOS1257150, IOS1856237]
  3. Carl Tryggers Foundation [20:98]
  4. Great Lakes Fisheries Commission [2017_CAS_54063]
  5. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries Grant [SER-2019-007]
  6. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders [RO1-DC-010809]
  7. Patagonia Conservation Grant
  8. University of Florida Research Opportunity Seed Grant
  9. European Commission [873178]
  10. Cymru Cofund Fellowship [663830-AU167]
  11. Fonds de Recherche Nature et Technologies du Quebec
  12. Anonymous Foundation Grant
  13. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [873178] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most BCF swimming fishes share similar oscillation amplitude during steady locomotion; tuna and eel differ in the length of the propulsive body wave; there is no decrease in head:tail amplitude from anguilliform to thunniform locomotion as traditionally expected.
Fishes exhibit an astounding diversity of locomotor behaviors from classic swimming with their body and fins to jumping, flying, walking, and burrowing. Fishes that use their body and caudal fin (BCF) during undulatory swimming have been traditionally divided into modes based on the length of the propulsive body wave and the ratio of head:tail oscillation amplitude: anguilliform, subcarangiform, carangiform, and thunniform. This classification was first proposed based on key morphological traits, such as body stiffness and elongation, to group fishes based on their expected swimming mechanics. Here, we present a comparative study of 44 diverse species quantifying the kinematics and morphology of BCF-swimming fishes. Our results reveal that most species we studied share similar oscillation amplitude during steady locomotion that can be modeled using a second-degree order polynomial. The length of the propulsive body wave was shorter for species classified as anguilliform and longer for those classified as thunniform, although substantial variability existed both within and among species. Moreover, there was no decrease in head:tail amplitude from the anguilliform to thunniform mode of locomotion as we expected from the traditional classification. While the expected swimming modes correlated with morphological traits, they did not accurately represent the kinematics of BCF locomotion. These results indicate that even fish species differing as substantially in morphology as tuna and eel exhibit statistically similar twodimensional midline kinematics and point toward unifying loco motor hydrodynamic mechanisms that can serve as the basis for understanding aquatic locomotion and controlling biomimetic aquatic robots.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available