4.8 Article

Prediction errors disrupt hippocampal representations and update episodic memories

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2117625118

Keywords

memory; cognitive neuroscience; hippocampus; prediction error; reconsolidation

Funding

  1. James S. McDonnell Foundation (Scholar Award in Understanding Human Cognition)
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-2014-05959, RGPIN-2020-05747]
  3. NSF (Graduate Research Fellowship)
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that hippocampal activation was influenced by prediction errors, affecting the relationship between hippocampal activation and memory. The evolution of hippocampal activation patterns impacted memory updating, while concurrent basal forebrain activity supported cholinergic modulation of attention and memory.
The brain supports adaptive behavior by generating predictions, learning from errors, and updating memories to incorporate new information. Prediction error, or surprise, triggers learning when reality contradicts expectations. Prior studies have shown that the hippocampus signals prediction errors, but the hypothesized link to memory updating has not been demonstrated. In a human functional MRI study, we elicited mnemonic prediction errors by interrupting familiar narrative videos immediately before the expected endings. We found that prediction errors reversed the relationship between univariate hippocampal activation and memory: greater hippocampal activation predicted memory preservation after expected endings, but memory updating after surprising endings. In contrast to previous studies, we show that univariate activation was insufficient for understanding hippocampal prediction error signals. We explain this surprising finding by tracking both the evolution of hippocampal activation patterns and the connectivity between the hippocampus and neuromodulatory regions. We found that hippocampal activation patterns stabilized as each narrative episode unfolded, suggesting sustained episodic representations. Prediction errors disrupted these sustained representations and the degree of disruption predicted memory updating. The relationship between hippocampal activation and subsequent memory depended on concurrent basal forebrain activation, supporting the idea that cholinergic modulation regulates attention and memory. We conclude that prediction errors create conditions that favor memory updating, prompting the hippocampus to abandon ongoing predictions and make memories malleable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available