4.8 Article

Predicted wind and solar energy expansion has minimal overlap with multiple conservation priorities across global regions

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2104764119

Keywords

renewable; energy; biodiversity; conservation

Funding

  1. Addressing the Valuation of Energy and Nature Together [NE/M019640/1]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
  3. University of Southampton studentship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protected areas and renewable energy generation are important in combating biodiversity loss and climate change, but there may be conflicts between the two due to limited land resources. However, with appropriate policies and regulations, renewable energy can help decarbonize the energy sector without significantly impacting conservation targets.
Protected areas and renewable energy generation are critical tools to combat biodiversity loss and climate change, respectively. Over the coming decades, expansion of the protected area network to meet conservation objectives will be occurring alongside rapid deployment of renewable energy infrastructure to meet climate targets, driving potential conflict for a finite land resource. Renewable energy infrastructure can have negative effects on wildlife, and co-occurrence may mean emissions targets are met at the expense of conservation objectives. Here, we assess current and projected overlaps of wind and solar photovoltaic installations and important conservation areas across nine global regions using spatially explicit wind and solar data and methods for predicting future renewable expansion. We show similar levels of co-occurrence as previous studies but demonstrate that once area is accounted for, previous concerns about overlaps in the Northern Hemisphere may be largely unfounded, although they are high in some biodiverse countries (e.g., Brazil). Future projections of overlap between the two land uses presented here are generally dependent on priority threshold and region and suggest the risk of future conflict can be low. We use the best available data on protected area degradation to corroborate this level of risk. Together, our findings indicate that while conflicts between renewables and protected areas inevitably do occur, renewables represent an important option for decarbonization of the energy sector that would not significantly affect area-based conservation targets if deployed with appropriate policy and regulatory controls.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available