4.8 Article

Defining and quantifying the core microbiome: Challenges and prospects

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2104429118

Keywords

core microbiome; microbiota; microbial ecology; 16S ribosomal RNA gene

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The term core microbiome refers to a set of microbial taxa or attributes associated with those taxa that are characteristic of a host or environment, with little consensus on how it should be quantified in practice. Various metrics have been used, but many are susceptible to biases, highlighting the need for standardized metrics for studying core microbiomes.
The term core microbiome has become widely used in microbial ecology over the last decade. Broadly, the core microbiome refers to any set of microbial taxa, or the genomic and functional attributes associated with those taxa, that are characteristic of a host or environment of interest. Most commonly, core microbiomes are measured as the microbial taxa shared among two or more samples from a particular host or environment. Despite the popularity of this term and its growing use, there is little consensus about how a core microbiome should be quantified in practice. Here, we present a brief history of the core microbiome concept and use a representative sample of the literature to review the different metrics commonly used for quantifying the core. Empirical analyses have used a wide range of metrics for quantifying the core microbiome, including arbitrary occurrence and abundance cutoff values, with the focal taxonomic level of the core ranging from phyla to amplicon sequence variants. However, many of these metrics are susceptible to sampling and other biases. Developing a standardized set of metrics for quantifying the core that accounts for such biases is necessary for testing specific hypotheses about the functional and ecological roles of core microbiomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available