4.8 Article

Grapevines under drought do not express esca leaf symptoms

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2112825118

Keywords

abiotic-biotic interactions; carbon balance; drought; plant dieback; vascular disease

Funding

  1. French Ministry of Agriculture and Food
  2. FranceAgriMer
  3. Comite National des Interprofessions des Vins a appellation d'origine et a indication geographique within the PHYSIOPATH Project (Program Plan National Deperissement du Vignoble) [22001150-1506]
  4. Isabelle Demeaux (UMR SAVE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In grapevine, drought completely inhibited the leaf symptom expression of vascular disease (esca). By quantifying whole-plant water relations and carbon balance, the study revealed distinct physiological responses to these two stresses, indicating different gas exchange and nonstructural carbohydrate dynamics.
In the context of climate change, plant mortality is increasing worldwide in both natural and agroecosystems. However, our understanding of the underlying causes is limited by the complex interactions between abiotic and biotic factors and the technical challenges that limit investigations of these interactions. Here, we studied the interaction between two main drivers of mortality, drought and vascular disease (esca), in one of the world's most economically valuable fruit crops, grapevine. We found that drought totally inhibited esca leaf symptom expression. We disentangled the plant physiological response to the two stresses by quantifying whole-plant water relations (i.e., water potential and stomatal conductance) and carbon balance (i.e., CO2 assimilation, chlorophyll, and nonstructural carbohydrates). Our results highlight the distinct physiology behind these two stress responses, indicating that esca (and subsequent stomatal conductance decline) does not result from decreases in water potential and generates different gas exchange and nonstructural carbohydrate seasonal dynamics compared to drought.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available