4.7 Article

Rational Design in Catalysis: A Mechanistic Study of β-Hydride Eliminations in Gold(I) and Gold(III) Complexes Based on Features of the Reaction Valley

Journal

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 55, Issue 17, Pages 8636-8645

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b01188

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [CTQ2013-48937-C2-2-P]
  2. Ministerio de Educacion Cultura y Deporte
  3. National Science Foundation [CHE 1464906, CHE 1152357]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Chemistry [1152357] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

beta-Hydride eliminations for ethylgold(III) dichloride complexes are identified as reactions with an unusually long prechemical stage corresponding to the conformational preparation of the reaction complex and spanning six phases. The prechemical process is characterized by a geared rotation of the L-Au-L group (L = Cl) driving methyl group rotation and causing a repositioning of the ligands. This requires more than 28 kcal/mol of the total barrier of 34.0 kcal/mol, according to the unified reaction valley approach, which also determines that the energy requirements of the actual chemical process leading to the beta-elimination product are only about 5.5 kcal/mol. A detailed mechanistic analysis was used as a basis for a rational design of substrates (via substituents on the ethyl group) and/or ligands, which can significantly reduce the reaction barrier. This strategy takes advantage of either a higher trans activity of the ligands or a tuned electronic demand of the ethyl group. The beta-hydride elimination of gold(I) was found to suffer from strong Coulomb and exchange repulsion when a positively charged hydrogen atom enforces a coordination position in a d(10)-configured gold atom, thus triggering an unassisted sigma-pi Au-I-C conversion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available